0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£ °á°ú ºÐ·ùü°èÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º °ËÁõ -Áö¿ª»çȸ °£È£°á°ú¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î-

Validation of the nursing outcomes classification (NOC) to nursing in Korea

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 13±Ç 3È£ p.523 ~ 531
KMID : 0607720020130030523
ÀÌÀºÁÖ ( Lee Eun-Joo ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ °£È£°úÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance and sensitivity to nursing interventions of six sensitive nursing outcomes selected from the Nursing Outcomes Classification. the outcomes in this study were self-care: activities of daily living, treatment behavior: illness or injury, knowledge: health promotion, caregiver performance: direct care, and caregiver physical health.

Method: Data were collected from 97 visiting nurses working in public health centers located in a province and a capital city. The fehring method was used to estimate outcomes and indicators for content validity. Simultaneous multiple regression and stepwise regression were used to evaluate relationships between each outcome and its indicators.

Results: Results confirmed the importance and nursing sensitivity of the outcomes and thier indicators. Multiple regression revealed key indicators of each outcome. Self-care: instrumental activity of daily living needed to be revised. Neither all of the indicators nor the indicators showing the highest importance and contribution ratio were selected as independent variables for the stepwise regresion model. the R2 of the regression models ranged from 29 to 56% in importance by selected indicators and from 56 to 83% in contribution.

Conclusion: Further research is needed for the revision of outcomes and their indicators.
KeyWords
Ÿ´çµµ Á¶»ç, °á°ú»çÁ¤, ¿ë¾î
validatin studies, outcome assessment, vocabulary
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed